I’ll use a term that gets mentioned all the time in other facets of business (and porn is a dying business because of their failure to understand principles of business). Whether you use the term “supply and demand”, or I prefer the term “saturation”, it means rather than having a product that is a “commodity”, you have instead a product that is more than anyone can ever satiate their appetites with! Yes us porn fanatics jack off all the time to Jada Stevens, Remy LaCroix, Riley Reid, Jenna Haze, Maddy O’Reilly, Lisa Ann, etc. As a result I’m not meeting my needs with “Amateur Midwest Girls 92”, looking for some girl from the State I live in.
In other words, why even seek out “something new” when I get off to what I already enjoy? That then asks the question “Why should I even try to buy every movie Riley Reid shot in 2014 when I’m only interested in her one scene of 5 in each flick?” Hint Hint- give me access to the content I want, and stop shooting content I don’t. Don’t give me filler porn. Porn I don’t wanna watch, and have no interest in. I hate analogies, but some of us “Want a Big Mac”, and could give a fuck less about a “Whopper” (though the girls love whopper cocks LOL).
If we’re at a fast food restaurant, and they tell us “would you like fries with that”?, and we didn’t ask for them, why the fuck would I want “X scene” with “X pornstar” as part of what I’m purchasing? Let us buy the porn we want. Whether it be “scene by scene” (I’ve addressed this fact over and over again here at the blog- this is for all the new sluts I’ve met at Xhamster, Xvideos, etc. that joined this blog because of those free porntube sites- slut is not derogatory either in today’s society; “Bonnie Rotten” aka “whore” is- she’s doing it for $$$$), or paying the girls directly. I would prefer that option. Them shooting for themselves, and not making Elegant Angel, Vivid, and those other sites that spit up and chew out porn talent Millions at their expense!
Ironically, and I wasn’t going to type this, but anyone can shoot their own porn on their I-Phone, Android, digital camera and submit them to porntube sites and make money! Who needs these Porn Producers? I would love to start a “Porn Union” for these girls with insurance (most of these girls tweet about how grateful they are for “Obamacare”, and how fucking disgusting is that?), 401k options, etc. “They reap what they sow”, and are truly appreciated for the pleasure they provide us. I don’t say to myself “I’m watching Riley Reid fuck in this scene because she’s shooting for Jules Jordan instead of Elegant Angel”, so why does it matter whether instead she’s shooting for her own company, making every cent of revenue for doing so?
I got a little carried away, but the morale of the story is “Porn is good because the feature girls make enough money shooting for multiple companies, and they meet our demand for their smut as a result”. However the business model is flawed, because those “Companies” are making us pay for porn we don’t want (and I’d pay a fair and reasonable price to watch the girls I enjoy) because they don’t want to offer us a cheaper alternative to get the content we actually want from their materials. I’m convinced too that the girls would find out “Oh my scenes were downloaded 100k times for “X amount” yet you paid me the same $$$ as “x girl” from the same movie who’s scene was downloaded 10k times!” If that happened, those girls would rebel.
They should be paid for what they generate revenue. Yes many girls would quit the industry because they had to fuck for 1/100th the amount of money the top 5 or 10 pornstars received as payment, but that “saturation” I mentioned would disappear as a result, and it would be “survival of the fittest”. That same “Midwest Girls 92” performer might get on Twitter, go to all the strip clubs in the Midwest and make sure she made more money too. She’d find herself “reaping what she sowed” too. Porn would be better overall because the girls would know “The more perverts who download this scene I’m doing, the more money I make”. If one of these girls came to a studio they’re shooting for drunk, or not into the guy she was working with, then she shouldn’t receive the same amount of money she got for an AVN Award winning scene. Some of these girls (Samantha Saint, and the list goes on- I’ll write about that next as a follow up to this) sell out and get complacent. They know that the companies they work for will get them Award nominations they don’t deserve. There’s a reason they go home empty handed even though they’re hot as fuck, used to do gonzo condom free (not (garbage features with condoms) and one took facials like champs. They sold out for the easy $$$$. Contracts could be ripped up, which would benefit the companies that survive this purge too.
I could see a scenario from Wicked Pictures now. “Samantha, your movies tanked. They sold this and that, and we’re paying you far more with your contract than what you’ve generated for us. You are the weakest link! Goodbye!” I know if I don’t do my fair share at my company, I’m expendable, and should be let go. Why should porn be any different? “The bottom feeders” of the industry (amateur bbw’s taking 30 facials for $300 that generate $30k) subsidize the girls doing “artsty fartsy films” that don’t sell dick. Personally, I would rather watch a girl that got too drunk on wine one night convince her boyfriend to let her film her gangbanging 10 of his friends on “Xtube” or any “free porntube site” than 99% of the girls in this industry. Ironically, stating that number, there’s a solid 100 girls that are worthwhile, and I will drop anything I’m doing to download their smut. I’d pay if you made me affordable to do so instead.
Rant over. My last tirade about this failure of an industry here for a while (maybe? LOL). Having said this, I know that Riley (she’s never said one negative word to me at Twitter or most of them- they appreciate what I’m saying in fact though they can’t admit that to the agents they pay 15% or more to) won’t have a problem with this post like that imbecile Bonnie Rotten did and will with this too! Trying to say I’m spreading falsehoods. Trying to say I’m wrong, and others who enjoy porn like I do don’t identify or agree with me (that they enjoy paying for it)!
On that note, one last analogy (and I obviously love them LOL)! Why would anyone pay $3.50 for gas when they could fill their gas tanks for free with a little effort (trick the gas to pump for free, etc.)? Now that same guy or girl (and that’s the thing that’s lost in all this- I’d say it’s almost even that girls watch as much porn as men now- and 85% of them don’t download porn- they watch porntube sites for free) instead could pay $.99 and not have to do anything risky. Pay for her gas, and go on her way thinking to herself “I don’t have a problem paying for this gas for $.99 a gallon when they used to extort me for $3.50 a gallon instead”. That’s something to keep in mind. Content will always be shot and consumed. Why should us “the consumer” pay as much as we do to “consume it” when we can get ourselves off for free?